You Spin me Right-round baby...when you go Left.
I just read an article poking at Mitt Romney for what IT says is his idea of “Middle-Class” income (of course hoping for you to think he is out of touch and too rich).
Lets take a look:
From the HuffPost:
But how does he define “middle-income”? The Republican presidential nominee defined it as income of $200,000 to $250,000 a year.
Romney commented during an interview broadcast Friday on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”
The Census Bureau reported this week that the median household income — the midpoint for the nation — is just over $50,000.
The definition of “middle income” or the “middle class” is politically charged. Both presidential candidates are fighting to win over working-class voters.
President Barack Obama has defined “middle class” as income up to $250,000 a year.
Obama wants to extend Bush-era tax cuts for those making less than $250,000. Romney wants to extend the tax cuts for everyone.
[click title for link]
And now the Boston (AP)
BOSTON (AP) — Mitt Romney is promising to reduce taxes on middle-income Americans.
But how does he define ‘‘middle-income”? The Republican presidential nominee defined it Friday as income of $200,000 to $250,000 a year and less.
The definition of ‘‘middle income’’ or the ‘‘middle class’’ is politically charged as Romney and President Barack Obama fight to win over working-class voters. Romney would be among the wealthiest presidents, if elected, and Democrats have repeatedly painted him as out of touch with average people.
Obama also has set his definition for ‘‘middle class’’ as families with income of up to $250,000 a year.
Romney’s comments came an interview broadcast Friday on ABC’s ‘‘Good Morning America.’’
‘‘No one can say my plan is going to raise taxes on middle-income people, because principle number one is (to) keep the burden down on middle-income taxpayers,’’ Romney told host George Stephanopoulos.
‘‘Is $100,000 middle income?’’ Stephanopoulos asked.
‘‘No, middle income is $200,000 to $250,000 and less,’’ Romney responded.
His campaign later clarified that Romney was referencing household income, not individual income.
The Census Bureau reported this week that the median household income — the midpoint for the nation — is just over $50,000.
Obama wants to extend Bush-era tax cuts for those making less than $250,000, while Romney wants to extend the tax cuts for everyone.
Romney has not explained how he would keep his plan from growing the nation’s deficit.
[LINK]
“President Barack Obama has defined “middle class” as income up to $250,000 a year.
Obama wants to extend Bush-era tax cuts for those making less than $250,000. Romney wants to extend the tax cuts for everyone.”
Because Romney said “Everyone” that means he included $250K+ people… so the writer of the Huffington Post version of this article is defining what Romey is calling “middle class” for himself.
Look at President Obama’s definition above - then look at Romney’s: “The Republican presidential nominee defined it Friday as income of $200,000 to $250,000 a year and less.”
250K and Less (says Romney)
Up to 250K says Obama…
Those sound crazy similar to me, don’t they to you?
—-
HuffPost is crazy liberal, oh and they left out this key point: “His campaign later clarified that Romney was referencing household income, not individual income.”-Boston (AP)
And you thought Fox was the only player. Correction, the only Conservative player…
